CVS and Aetna contend their outrageous partnership will be good for consumers. Here’s because we should be skeptical

The CEOs of drug tradesman CVS and health insurer Aetna were marvelously in sync Sunday when they jointly announced their companies’ $69-billion partnership deal.

The understanding will “dramatically serve commission consumers,” Aetna’s Mark Bertolini said. It will “create a height that is easier to use and reduction dear for consumers,” according to Larry J. Merlo, boss and CEO of CVS Health. They steady these mantras to a press in a array of corner interviews.

All that was blank was a idea to how, exactly, this obscurity of better, cheaper medical was to be reached. Clues to how small courtesy a companies have paid to that fact could be found via their corner announcement. “With a analytics of Aetna and CVS Health’s tellurian touch, we will emanate a medical height built around individuals,” Merlo said, in a masterpiece of unfilled corp-speak.

After all, Aetna doesn’t need to combine with CVS to feat a “analytics”; ostensibly, it already has information in palm to assistance a business conduct their health needs, and if it needs a organisation like CVS to assistance out, a companies could pointer a contract. The proclamation claims a partnership will finish adult “helping patients equivocate nonessential sanatorium readmissions,” as a proclamation claims. But a joined association won’t possess any hospitals and isn’t planning, during slightest during first, to place some-more physicians on a payroll.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>